Breathing History

Breathing History

By Jennifer Allen

When I meet Franz Schmidt, we go for a walk. As we wander through Oslo – from our meeting place at the arts academy Kunsthøgskolen i Oslo to the building complex Prinds Christian Augusts Minde (Prindsen) to the contemporary art gallery Oslo Kunstforening – Schmidt tells me about the past: the histories of the city, neighbourhoods, buildings, Norwegian textile industry (from its stellar rise to its partial demise), power looms and, of course, his own work, which led to this project. We are wandering not only through Oslo but also through a kind of chronology. In Schmidt’s hands – or should I say “feet”? – space becomes time.

This particular connection between space and time – whereby movement fuses with recollection – has been documented in Frances A. Yates’s classic study of the history of mnemonic techniques The Art of Memory (1966). That history begins with the Greek poet Simonides of Ceos (c. 556 – 468 BC) who inadvertently discovered the first art of memory when he was invited to recite at a nobleman‘s banquet in Ancient Thessaly. As Simonides went outside to meet messengers, the hall collapsed behind him, crushing all of the guests to death. Yet Simonides was able to identify the disfigured victims for their family members because he recalled precisely where each guest had been sitting at the banquet table. His impromptu solution developed into the elaborate, venerated art of “memory loci” (memory places): positioning evocative images of what one wanted to recall within the architecture of a specific building. Any one building could be used in the imagination to remember not only guests but also other elements: treatises, arguments, contracts, even poems. As one spoke, one would “walk” in one’s mind from one room to the next, from one image to the next, set up in each room like a flash card for total recall.

Like Simonides, Schmidt remembers real places, their pasts and the people who once inhabited them: crushed, not by a decrepit hall, but by economics and the sheer passage of time. He revisits buildings not just in his imagination but with his body, reminding me that the Oslo Kunstforening gallery is the oldest building in the city, just as we enter it. His texts about this project combine historical facts with strong sense perceptions: a warm intense spring, a dark shiny green moss, the feel of fabric in a textile sample book. What’s equally striking about the artist’s approach to the art of memory loci is his fusion of collective and individual histories. The arts academy is not only a former sail-cloth factory but also his alma mater. Prindsen was once not only home to visiting Danish kings, a reform house and an insane asylum but also part of Schmidt’s neighbourhood. As we inspect the rows of abandoned power looms inside the Prindsen complex, he explains how the inmates used them decades ago, followed many years later by one of his own colleagues, a former textile professor.

Unlike Simonides, Schmidt treats the art of memory loci as a means of reviving history: a two-way expansive path that runs from the past back to the present and into the future. Simonides could not revive the guests; Schmidt will make the Prindsen power looms run once again to produce textiles – just as he has done with the older machines he found at the traditional mill in Sjølingstad and with the older historical patterns he found at the modern mill Gudbrandsdalen Woollen Mill in Lillehammer.

Since the artist collaborates with the employees from the mills – and with fashion designers in and outside of Norway, looking for exceptional textiles – his individual work is a living past moving towards a collective future. Even in the Oslo Kunstforening gallery, Schmidt explains its history and then how he will set up his own upcoming exhibition, which recalls the various steps of his project, much like an itinerary: from Sjølingstad to Lillehammer to Oslo, from revamping the old power looms to making a suit from the cloth produced by them. As such, his project is not an immobile solitary monument but closer to a mobile, living network. All threads are connected with each other while leading to other people, places and pieces of fabric.

Schmidt’s art will always involve a double displacement since he has a holistic approach to the medium of textiles. On the one hand, the artist has moved from one town to the next to practice his art, from one mill to the next, from one loom to the next, from one cloth and suit to the next, because he was seeking not only to recall the past but also to revive it with others for the future – specifically at the Prindsen complex, which will become the active sum of his experiences. On the other hand, the artist cannot show the entire project in a classic white cube without a certain element of loss, precisely because he sought the full experience of textiles, not just one part of them, not just a photograph of them, not just one textile sample book, not just one fabric. But how to exhibit what is essentially an art of memory loci which occurs in specific mills and buildings in Norway and not just in the imagination? Schmidt decided to show, among other elements, a selection of archival materials, tools and souvenirs as well as meters of unique wool fabrics that he produced at the mills along with custom-made suits created with his fabrics. These exhibition pieces appear as the opposite of memento mori: not reminders of death but reminders that the textile traditions will live on.

Img.su5.gen

Photo: Märta Thisner

Img.wffs%20catalogue1

Photo: Fin Serck-Hanssen

1/8
Img.wffs%20catalogue2

Photo: Fin Serck-Hanssen

2/8
Img.wffs%20catalogue3

Photo: Fin Serck-Hanssen

3/8
Img.wffs%20catalogue4

Photo: Fin Serck-Hanssen

4/8
Img.wffs%20catalogue5

Photo: Fin Serck-Hanssen

5/8
Img.wffs%20catalogue6

Photo: Fin Serck-Hanssen

6/8
Img.wffs%20catalogue7

Photo: Fin Serck-Hanssen

7/8
Img.wffs%20catalogue8

Photo: Fin Serck-Hanssen

8/8

Introduction to the history of the Norwegian textile industry

The first Norwegian industrial company in a modern sense was the spinning and weaving mill Haldens Bomuldsspinderi & Væveri, established by Mads Wiel in 1813 by Tistedalsfossen. The machines were acquired through the Danish company C.A. Nordberg.1 The cotton was imported from England. The local assets were capital, water power, available labour and a Scandinavian market.2

Industrial development in Norway in the 1800s built on what started with innovations in textile production in England in the 1700s. The flying shuttle that made the weaving more efficient marked the beginning of what would become the Industrial Revolution in 1733. The development of textile production followed the dramatic technological breakthroughs in the latter half of the 18th century, in iron, steel and energy. The steam engine was developed in the 1760s, the same decade as spinning - the most time-consuming part of textile production - was revolutionised by the invention of Spinning Jenny, which was water powered and spun more than one yarn at a time.3 In 1784, the first textile company with these spinning machines was established outside of Manchester. This is considered to be the first modern industrial company.4 The first water-powered loom was patented in 1785.5

Norway entered the process of industrialisation relatively late. But there were a few precursors - the mill in Halden was one, and Solberg Spinderi, established in 1818 along Drammenselven, was another.6 It was in the 1840s that the great breakthrough came, largely because in 1843 England lifted its export ban on textile machines and the knowledge of running them.7 This led to a significant increase in the textile industry during a short period of time. In 1840, 138 tonnes of cotton were imported to Norway, while in 1860 it was 2,053 tonnes.8

The best-known companies, which became the largest employers in the country, were Nydalens Compagnie, established in 1845 by Adam Hjorth, and Vøien Spinneri, established in 1845 by Knud Graah, both along the river Akerselven in Christiania - the official name for Oslo from 1624 to 1925. Arne Fabrikker was established not far from Bergen in 1846 by Peter Jebsen. The large Hjula Veveri factory was built next to Vøien Spinneri in 1855 by a key figure in the industry, the entrepreneur Halvor Schou, after he had operated at a smaller scale at the Brenneriveien Veveri from 1849.9 Christiania Seildugsfabrik, where the Oslo National Academy of the Arts is now located, opened in 1856.10

Production was established through the import of both equipment and technical knowledge, in the first phase from England after 1843, and later from other countries, primarily Germany. The mills I have worked with were established towards the end of a period that began in the mid-1860s. The reason for the establishment of woollen mills was that cotton as a raw material, which the first industrial establishments relied on, became more difficult to source because of the civil war in the United States. It was an obvious turn then to use local raw materials as a replacement. Mills based on the use of wool were established in larger cities and districts characterised by agriculture and shepherding, with good conditions for utilising water power.

The weaving mills were part of a textile and clothing industry that developed to become the largest industry in the country. Spinning mills, weaving mills and clothing manufacturers delivered high quality products that were often entirely local, including the raw materials.

After a generally positive period in the 1950s with growth in the industry, it became increasingly difficult to compete with foreign production in the 1960s. The wage levels in Norway gradually increased, and the most laborious part of the industry, the manufacturing of garments, experienced problems first. Closures in this part of the industry also led to closures of the weaving mills that had supplied fabric for clothing production. Ever-increasing international competition and changes in tax and customs systems led to further challenges. The companies survived by collaborating in various combinations.

But today, from a historical perspective, very few mills remain in Norway. There are two major companies in the market, Gudbrandsdalens Woollen Mill and Innvik, two medium-sized firms, Røros Tweed and Krivi, and one smaller business, Grinakervev. Sjølingstad Woollen Mill still has some production, but is primarily a museum.


  1. Kristine Bruland, British Technology and European Industrialization: The Norwegian Textile Industry in the Mid-Nineteenth century, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1989, p. 40. 

  2. http://industrimuseum.no/haldens_bomull 

  3. Sven Beckert, Empire of Cotton: A Global History, Vintage, New York, 2014, p. 65. 

  4. Ibid., p. 57. 

  5. Ibid., p. 66. 

  6. British Technology and European Industrialization, p. 39. 

  7. Ibid., p. 3. 

  8. Ibid., p. 39. 

  9. Sigurd Grieg, Norsk Tekstil, vol. 1, Norske Tekstilfabrikers Hovedforening, Oslo, 1948, pp. 288-333. 

  10. Ibid., p. 448. 

Invention and Inquiry

By Theodor Barth

At one level Franz Schmidt’s work is about learning under mobile and distributed conditions. His mobility as an artist is one of post-industrial vagrancy, inventing his practice at the pace of his inquiries into the vestiges of textile industry yet located in Norway. Invention and inquiry are the two faces of his artistic research.

The one (invention) has been focussed on setting up camp inside the industrial facilities of the Woolen Mills at Sjølingstad (near Mandal, in the South of Norway) and Lillehammer (Inland Norway, Gudbrandsdalen). The other (inquiry) has been set on compile cata- logues of textile samples and patterns, on both sites.

Yet, his work at the two woolen mills—Sjølingstad Uldvarefabrik and Gudbrandsdalens Uldvarefabrik—represent two different phases in his artistic research project; indeed, I would say two different artistic modes. In the sense that the two places became sites for an exploration of two different artistic connections to industry.

In one site he would invent his atelier inside the industrial facil- ities at Sjølingstad, and let it merge with this environment to yield the workshop situation he needed for his project. In this phase he also would collect oral history, perfect re-makes of the epochal 727 marine blue fabric, and refine the tailoring of men’s suits from this and other fabrics.

The working habits, ways of knowing, life-style and demeanour impressed on him by the workshop-situation—in combination with his inquiries into the archive—constitues a reflection on the prec- edent of the Arts&Crafts movement; with an approach to artistic research which became rooted in and inspired by dOCUMENTA(13) in 2012.

In this middle phase—when he worked at the Gudbrandsdal’s mode—sought and cultivated a different sort of connection to the mode of production, at the still active woolen mill in Lillehammer. Today, Gudbrandsdalen Uldvarefabrik (GU) lives from sizeable industrial commissions abroad, with Danish Kvadrat as one of its customers.

His GU-mode of association with the textile industry, however, yields a very different output: in this middle-phase of his research fellowship, his experimentation with simplicity in vestimentary forms, elementary textures in material qualities and colour systems, inquiring into the Bauhaus precedent. In this phase, or mode, Franz Schmidt engaged actively in dis- plays and exhibits on arenas where the connection to the art-sphere was at once affirmed, questioned and invented. This holds both of his contribution to the exhibit A Thousand Threads (Lillehammer) and his fashion-display with HAiK in Oslo, both in 2014.

It would be erronous, however, to see these two bents—or, faces—of his work as dichotomous: the one leading, as it were, to Savile Row, the other to the designer’s staging of modern life. Rather, they constitute complementary approaches to the artist’s détournement of industrial mass-production. In my view, Franz Schmidt approach as an artistic research fellow includes archaeological, historical and contemporary layers: in the archaeological layer he acts as an apprentice in anachro- nisms, in the historical layer as a journeyman of art-school tradi- tions, and in the contemporary layer as master in tailoring and a designer of connective citations.

Img.sellgren23
1/3
Img.sellgren15
2/3
Img.sellgren38
3/3

Img.landheim14
Img.landheim4
Img.landheim5
Img.landheim3
Img.landheim6
Img.salhus3
Img.salhus4
Img.salhus7
Img.salhus9
Img.salhus8
Img.salhus10

Scann.landheim4
1/6
Scann.landheim12
2/6
Scann.landheim14
3/6
Scann.landheim20
4/6
Scann.landheim21
5/6
Scann.landheim31
6/6